This weekend, as part of the London 2012 Olympic closing ceremony, the Olympics will be handed over from London to 2016 host Rio de Janeiro in Brazil.
Fred Gelli with the Rio 2016 Olympic identity
Fred Gelli, creative director of Tátil, the Brazilian consultancy that created the Rio 2016 Olympic and Paralympic branding, will be watching as his group’s identity officially comes into use. Design Week caught up with Gelli to discuss the 2016 branding and what he thinks of the London 2012 identity.
Design Week: What brief did the organising committee give you for the Rio 2016 Olympics identity?
Fred Gelli: The brief involved 12 different attributes that the organising committee said this logo should have – like that it should represent Rio in the future and that it should be for all 6 billion people in the world. The first time we saw these 12 attributes we said, ‘It’s impossible to get all of this into a single logo.’ We came to the conclusion that the identity had to focus on some single points that would really represent Rio’s soul.
DW: So how did you develop a focus for the identity?
FG: We defined four pillars that we call brand direction – like a kind of compass that guarantees that all of the expressions will be connected with the soul of the brand. These four pillars are: our exuberant nature; the captivating energy this logo should show; the multiplicity of our culture; and the Olympic spirit.
Development of the Rio 2016 Olympcis identity
DW: And how did you create the logo from that?
FG: We decided to do the project in a very particular way. We are a big company in Brazil – 130 people in two offices – and we decided everyone should work together on this. When I’m taking about everybody I’m not just talking about the designers but people like the receptionists as well. I remember one day I invited Josangela our receptionist to look at some models and said, “Can you see in this logo Rio in the Future?’ and she said, ‘Hmmm no Fred, I really can’t see this.’ It was important for us that this was a logo for everyone, not just for designers.
DW: How did you come up with the idea of a 3D logo?
FG: One day I was at the Lagoa Rodrigo de Freitas – a small lake in the centre of Rio with many mountains around it. And I realised that Rio is a kind of sculptural city – I’m in the middle of this big sculpture. I understood then that it would be a very interesting approach to design a sculptural logo for a sculptural city. As well as this we also considered that the logo had to work well until 2016, across different devices. And also for products it’s very interesting to have a 3D logo. We also wanted a new way to represent the Sugarloaf mountain [whose shape is referenced in the logo] in a new way. So many Brazilian brands use this image, and we wanted to use the same icon but in a new way.
The sculptural version of the Rio 2016 identity
DW: Some people have mentioned that they can see the word Rio in the logo, is that something you intended?
FG: No! This was another amazing thing – after we presented the logo people started to see things in it – like the mayor of Rio at the launch he said, ‘I can see Rio there,’ I was like, ‘Really, where?!’ There is a concrete meaning and a subjective meaning. So the green is our tropical forest and also represents our hope, the yellow is the sun, and also our warm and welcoming nature and the blue is the ocean, but at the same time representing the fluidity of life.
DW: How does your work on the Paralympic logo relate to the Olympic logo?
FG: The brief from the Paralympic Organising Committee was that the Paralympic and Olympic logos had to be in the same family. They also specifically requested a 3D logo. We had a lot of stereotypes in our mind about the Paralympics, but when you engage with Paralympians you lose all your preconceptions – you see the energy they have to have to go from the depths of experience, for example being in a crash and losing the ability to walk, to being at the top of the sport. We understood our logo should represent this journey, this infinite energy it must take. Another very important thing was not to use any sort of icon that represents Paralympics, like in Barcelona when they used the wheelchair.
The Rio 2016 Paralympics identity
DW: How did you develop this into an identity?
FG: We decided to express in this logo not the thing that represents our difference, but exactly the opposite – what we have in common. We decided to use two icons. One is the heart, and the other is the infinity symbol, to represent the infinite energy of the athletes. When you put this together you have a heart that beats with infinite energy. We also decided that this logo should be multisensory – for everybody. First of all it’s a 3D logo, so it already incorporates touch. To that we added a sound – a heartbeat. Connected to the sculpture is a subwoofer with vibrations, so deaf people can feel it and there is also a rhythmic light in it. We’re working on creating a smell too…
FG: There was a very emotional moment on the launch day. Ádria Santos – she’s a Brazilian Paralympic runner who has been blind since birth – when she arrived at the logo she started to touch it and felt the vibrations and she started to cry, and sure I cried too, and she said that was the first time in her career that she could feel the symbol of her life, she has been running in the Paralympics for 20 years. She said when she listened to the heartbeat she felt like it was for her heartbeat. We couldn’t have imagined that sort of response.
The Rio 2016 Paralympics identity with the Árvore Natal de Lagoa monument
DW: What do you think of Wolff Olins’ London 2012 Olympics logo and how do you think it compares to yours?
FG: I’m a very close friend of [Brazilian designer] Marina Willer [formerly of Wolff Olins and now a Pentagram partner]. We were together in Rio at a lecture and she criticised our logo, saying that we didn’t use the opportunity to create something that could be a breakthrough. My answer was that I think the briefings were completely different for Rio and London, the cities are completely different and the culture is completely different.
DW: What do you think of the London 2012 logo?
FG: We like the Logo Design– it’s very cutting edge and bold, but I do I think it has some technical problems, for example when it’s reduced the London type is lost. In our briefing the International Olympics Committee showed us many of the things that the London logo had done as things not do to. For example we couldn’t have any type within the logo – it had to be completely clean. We almost had a script on how to create a logo, based on the experience of London. The Rio organisers had obviously learned from that experience.
The Games identity in Rio
AM Do you think the 2012 logo represents London well?
FG: I think so – I think it represents a new London, with all the youth and all the energy and in this way it works really well. I think you as a country historically have brought for humanity many cutting-edge concepts. I feel you are a cutting-edge country and in this perspective the logo makes sense. But perhaps when you have an icon that is representing a cutting-edge and breakthrough culture then the rationale and explanation is more important and necessary than when you have an icon that is representing a culture that is very open and warm.